Shitoku’s correspondentie met Bhikkhu Y. Siri Nyana (F. Allen)

Shitoku’s correspondence with Bhikkhu Y. Siri Nyana (F. Allen)

Via Miss Horner van de Pali Text Society komt Shitoku in de lente van 1954 in contact met Bhikkhu Y. Siri Nyana (F. Allen). Opmerkelijk is alleszins de zin in diens eerste brief  (11/04/1954):

In spring 1954, via Miss Horner from the Pali Text Society, Shitoku gets in touch with Bhikkhu Y. Siri Nyana (F. Allen). In every respect, his first letter (04/11/1954) contains a remarkable passage:

In order to attain the peace here and now that Buddha-dhamma offers, it is not necessery to have a lot of books; only a few for reference purposes are really necessary to one. After studying one or two reliable introductory books to Buddhism in general, it is better to go on from these to reading the canonical books in translation.

… Dit had wel een passage kunnen zijn uit een van de vele gesprekken die we zelfs vandaag nog in onze sangha voeren.

… This could have been a passage from one of the many talks we have in our sangha, even nowadays.

   

En de laatste zin geeft alvast de toon van hetgeen later een zeer diepgaande studierelatie zal blijken:

And the last sentence sets the tone of what will prove to be a very profound study relationship between them.

Please send me any and all queries you have regarding Buddhism.

Dit laat Shitoku zich geen tweede keer vragen. Op 19/04/1954 reageert hij (let op de jeugdige leeftijd waarop hij al met boeddhisme bezig was!):

This is what Shitoku persued. He reacts on 04/19/1954 (pay attention to his young age when he was already truly interested in Buddhism!):

Just allow me to introduce myself to you. I am 27 years old, married, teacher for French, German and bookkeeping in a private school at Antwerp, rather poor than rich, so that I can’t afford to buy the books which would teach me more of the things I want to learn. I have especially studied philosophy and art, wrote poems neither splendid nor awful, some short stories and I was writing a novel that I stopped as it became clear to me that all those things were vanity and idleness. I started my way to Buddhism some 10 years ago by reading the Dhammapada, that influenced my mind and opened new views on life.


En dan komen zijn vragen. En tussen de regels lezen we reeds zijn kritische bedenkingen omtrent basisbegrippen in de leer van de Boeddha:

Then, his questions arise. And in between the lines, we already read his critical remarks about basic concepts in the teachings of the Buddha:

1° - The Buddha said: all things compound will be destroyed. But the object for rebirth, the character as you call it in your leaflet, isn’t it compound? Is it not a thing build up by all the actions and movements of the mind during an existence? The Buddha compared it with a flame of a candle going over to another candle, but isn’t a flame a thing compound?

2° - The Buddha said to obstain from killing, and the Sangha prohibited the eating of meat for this reason. But animals are not the only living things! Anything we eat is living: fruit, vegetables, rice, potatoes. Anything we use is nearly living: wood, wool, cotton, etc. Why restrict killing to animals? Is it because the suffering of animals appeals more directly to the perceiving human mind?

  

Vanuit Zürich reageert Bhikkhu Y. Siri Nyanaop 01/05/1955 in het kort (zie handschrift op achtergrond), en bij thuiskomst op 29/05/1955 uitgebreid:

From Zürich, Bhikkhu Y. Siri Nyana reacts shortly on 05/01/1955 (see the hand writing in the background), and arriving back home, he reacts more extensively on 05/29/1955:

You start by saying “I have learned a lot from books; but it seems to me that the Dharma is to be understood by more direct contact.”

This is very true: it is precisely so, and from this remark of yours alone I can tell you that you must have already progressed so far - further than many Buddhists get, and further indeed than the great majority of Asian Buddhists who are handicapped by their conventions and prejudices ever go. In Buddhisme Meditation and Contemplation take the place that prayer does in Christianity. The more one meditates the more one perceives the great wisdom in the Buddha’s utterances; and conversely, the more one reads the more one sees the necessity for contemplation.

But one does not, all the same, require to have a large number of books. These, like other posessions, become only a nuisance. (…)

… en dan komen zijn reacties op Shitoku’s opmerkingen:

… followed by his reactions on Shitoku’s questions:

Question 1 - A human being consists of 5 khandha (body or form, feeling or sensations, perceptions, mental tendencies & conditions, & consciousness). At death, all 5 khandha desintegrate. Nothing tangible is reborn, but simply the evolving character which is the result of our past acts, words & thoughts. Of course the character is changing continually - until one makes the supreme personal effort and attains Nirvana and with it liberation from the round of rebirth, when this continuity ceases. Nirvana means ‘cessation’. Therefore a human being is said to be no more than a process, like a burning flame.

Question 2 - In this respect (i.e. diet) each individual person has to apply the Middle Way of moderation as he thinks fit. Rules are dangerous; but for the monks there is an ancient rule forbidding them to eat animal food if they suspect that it has been killed especially for them; (…) If one goes to extremes one would be left without any food at all! The Buddha’s Middle Path avoids all extremes.

Ekō 118 - Schatten op Zolder

jikōji - 慈光寺

© 2008

info-at-jikoji.com
            home